![]() |
22 August 1855
My dear Sir, You were licensed under other circumstances as Senior Curate: for Mr. Paddon retains as Vicar his chief responsibility and refused in writing to me to entrust you with it. By the sequestration of the living this oversight of the Vicar is for the time removed: and I am by the Act of Parliament chargeable with the duty of providing a Senior Curate. This I am about to do. Your income will still be as now £100 and I will make myself responsible for £10 a year more in lieu of Lodging if you if you wish to remain as I hope you may under the new Curate. You ought to take into account in settling this the probability of Mr. Paddon's return next year and your continuance under him. I shall be glad at your early convenience to receive your decision as to remaining as I wish to fix the day for the new Curate's coming. I am yours ever, S. Oxon |
28 August 1855 My dear Mr Poyntz, I by no means wish to expose your health to risk; when therefore the weather is wet or stormy I do not require you to go into the Church. But when the weather is favourable and no such danger to your health exists then I must require you to give the parishioners the full burial service going into the Church for it until the Cemetery Chapel is built. This I hope speedily to see effected. I must beg your immediate answer whether you will retain the Second Curacy of Wycombe with the stipend of £100 (to which I will secure the addition of £10 for lodging) under the first Curate whom I am about to license loco vicarii or whether you adhere to your resignation of the Curacy. |
14 September 1855 My dear Sir, I was about to write to you as I promised, to say that Mr. Rice has made arrangements for taking at once possession of the Curacy of Wycombe; and as you persevere in your resolution not to continue in your Curacy under him, and I cannot consistently with what I deem the interests of the Parish place you in loco vicarii, I have desired the Registrar to cancel your licence on resignation at the same date with the licensing of Mr. Rice. In this case therefore there is no 'notice' needful: and as the bringing of the Second Curate depends upon my at once establishing Mr. Rice in the Curacy I think it best that you should resign it to him whatever day next week he is able to take possession. Though I think that your decision about burials was [deficient] in judgement I have no fault to find with your conduct as Curate of Wycombe: nor does my feeling it necessary to put another into the very responsible post which the Vicars conduct leaves open imply on my part any blame of you. I should be very happy to find you if I can another post in my Diocese. There is one now vacant at Edgcott in your own County of £90 a year to which I shall be happy at once to license you. I am ever most truly yours, S. Oxon. |
THE REV J.J. MANLEY M.A., Etonian, Graduate in Honours Oxford 1852, assisted by a resident Graduate in Honours of Cambridge, receives SIX GENTLEMEN to prepare them for the Universities or Bishops Examinations. VACANCIES after Christmas. Address: Cottered Rectory, Buntingford, Herts. |
The name of the Rev. Bradley Abbott has been a well-known one in the annals of Church life in South London. For forty years he laboured in one sphere, and when.....he died, while on his holiday abroad, it was recognised by all parties in the locality that a good, if not a great, man had passed away. 'Father' Abbott, as he was almost universally called, was Vicar of Christ Church, Clapham, a district lying between Larkhall Lane and Wandsworth Road. He built the church, and even to-day it is more often associated with his name than called by its legal designation. 'Father' Abbott was one of the pioneers of advanced ritualism in South London. I remember attending the church nearly a quarter of a century ago, and being impressed by the ornateness of the service. 'Fancy ritual' it was called then, even by some who were in sympathy with it..... [click the link above to read the full account] |
Robert Hebert Quick [right], a
lifelong friend of the Vicar J.L.Davies, served as an unpaid curate from
1854-58, preaching, baptizing occasionally and conducting a number
of weddings. He later became a leading educationalist - see his
biography The Life and Remains of the Rev. R.H. Quick (Macmillan 1899). More details
about his life and work here.
His curate is one of the men, a class, one would believe, from which something is to be expected, who would combine a decent order of worship and a zealous discharge of functions, priestly, if not sacerdotal, with liberal doctrine. In Shyre he finds an appropriate field for his labours.- There is no order or beauty of ritual, no life in the parochial ministrations. How he strives for better things, what hindrances and what help he finds from those about him, all this is described in a vigorous, life-like fashion, personal experience manifestly helping the writer throughout. Pareochial politics are discussed with the disaffected or indifferent townsfolk; sanitary reform with the selfish and pig-headed proprietors of cottage property; great intellectual questions, such as the bearing of science on religious belief, with the men of cultivation whom our curate, happier so far than many whom fate drops down in the average country town, finds among his parishioners. It is inevitable that the talk on these subjects should be, sometimes at least, more ponderous than befits the style of dialogue. That few men, in our judgment, have written as Sir Arthur Helps could write it. Yet, on the whole, it is vigorous and interesting. Perhaps the least satisfactory part of the book is the episode of the young lady who falls under the sacer dotal influences of a Romanising priest. We always expect to find some congruity between the life and the fate of the personage of a story; here we cannot see it. Why does she marry without affection, and separate from her husband, unless indeed the 'curate' himself, for whom she evidently has a preference, is to be blamed for it? Mr. Anderson is to be praised for his fortitude in resisting the temptation of marrying his hero, but poor Agnes Haswall has to suffer for it. |
The Appellant is charged with having offended against the Laws Ecclesiastical by writing and publishing within the diocese of London certain sermons or essays, collected together in parts and volumes, the whole being designated by the title of The Sling and the Stone, in which he is alleged to have maintained and promulgated doctrines contrary and repugnant to or inconsistent with the Articles of Religion and Formularies of the Church of England. |
His
appeal was dismissed and Voysey lost
his post. He returned to London and founded the Theistic Church in
1871, which welcomed former Jews alongside former Christians.
He also became an advocate of cremation.
He befriended Guy
Aldred, the
‘Boy Preacher’ of Holloway in 1903. A Corner
in the Kingdom of God: an account of some persons and things in St
Mark's, Whitechapel, 1861-63 was included in his book (a collection of six sermons) Do We Believe?
(Upfield, Green & Co., 1903): see here for a list of many of his other pamphlets. He died in
1912. His
father had been an architect, and his son Charles
Francis Annesley Voysey was a leading Arts and Crafts
designer. See the chapter on Voysey in banker and man of letters Edward Clodd's Memories (Putnam 1916), which also has a chapter on Charles Anderson (above). Left is a cartoon from Vanity
Fair 1871
– "I have much to be thankful for"; right an image from later life.
![]() ![]() |
A SCENE IN A CHURCH Recently Mr. John Wilson, a Cheshire gentleman, tore down certain inscriptions placed in Astbury Church appealing to the congregation to pray for the repose of the souls of the dead. Mr. Wilson has written to the Bishop of Chester, complaining that on the following Sunday while leaving church the Rev. John Colyer, the rector's son, exclaimed in a loud voice, "You are watched, you scoundrel!" Mr. Wilson replied, "Very likely, and I am come to see if any more Popish trash is put up in this porch. It it were I should take it down." Mr Colyer said, "You dare not, you scoundrel"; to which Mr Wilson answered, "And you dare not put it up again, you Popish idiot." Mr. William Colyer. another brother, then exclaimed, "If I had caught you at it, you scoundrel, I would have half-murdered you." Mr. Wilson made an angry retort, and some members of the congregation then interfered. |
Back to St Mark Whitechapel | Back to History